Generally speaking, we can identify two distinct impulses guiding the thought and activity of a significant number of churches and church movements today. The first centers on the cross as its defining principle and follows traditional Protestantism in that regard. This impulse can be observed most characteristically in the evangelical movement and regularly places emphasis on repentance and faith in Jesus, forgiveness of sin, and corresponding discipleship and spiritual growth. The second identifies with the Spirit and is clearly expressed in the charismatic movement, which has spread rapidly across the globe over the past century. Key motifs include spiritual gifts, experiential encounter with God, God's presence, revival, and power.
Again, these are generalizations. These two impulses are certainly not in opposition to one another and many churches and church movements lie along the spectrum with varying degrees of emphasis on one or the other. Both are obviously invaluable and should be applied together. But this is not so straightforward in actual practice. While some overtly try to reconcile the two, such as, for example, so-called Reformed charismatics, many still tend to prioritize one to the relegation, and in some cases rejection, of the other. Moreover, it is naturally difficult for people to focus intently on two points of emphasis. How then can we reconcile and integrate these two seemingly discrete impulses in a way that is theologically accurate but also practically applicable? How can we formulate a single, workable principle that includes both the cross and the Spirit?